Aurangzeb v Walker (2009)
Aurangzeb v Walker (2009)
Supreme Court Costs Office
Master Rogers
Date: 22/01/09
The Issues:The case involved a 3 year old child injured in a RTA. Damages of £500 were agreed pre-issue. The matter did not proceed to an infant settlement approval hearing, but instead the Defendant’s insurers were happy to pay damages in return for a parental indemnity. The costs could not be agreed. Should costs be paid in line with the small claims track, or did fixed predictable (RTA) costs apply?
Please sign in to have access to the full report.
Caselaw Sign In
If you're new here, this will guide you through creating an account. If you're already a member, simply enter your existing credentials to log in.
