Dimond v Lovell (2000)
Dimond v Lovell (2000)
House of Lords
Date: 11/05/00
The Issues:
The Claimant arranged a replacement car from a credit hire company whilst her vehicle was being repaired. However, the Defendant's insurers refused to pay the hire charges on the basis that:
- the hire agreement had not been prepared in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (‘the Act') and was therefore unenforceable; and
- the charges of £364.63 for an 8 day period of hire were unreasonable.
Please sign in to have access to the full report.
Caselaw Sign In
If you're new here, this will guide you through creating an account. If you're already a member, simply enter your existing credentials to log in.
