Box Legal Logo

Box Legal Logo
Home > ATE Caselaw > Houghton (Stanley) -v- P B Donaghue (Haulage & Plant Hire Ltd & Others) (2017)

Houghton (Stanley) -v- P B Donaghue (Haulage & Plant Hire Ltd & Others) (2017)

Houghton (Stanley) -v- P B Donaghue (Haulage & Plant Hire Ltd & Others) (2017)

The Issues:

During the course of litigation the defendant made a Part 36 offer of £360,000.00.  That offer was not accepted, it was not withdrawn.  The trial started and evidence was heard over two days.  During the trial the claimant applied for permission to accept the Part 36 offer.  The defendant objected.

The Rules – CPR 36.11 means that a party requires permission of the court to accept a Part 36 offer in certain circumstances.

(3) The court’s permission is required to accept a Part 36 offer where –

(d) a trial is in progress.

The Judge reviewed three authorities when considering this case: Capital Bank Plc v Stickland [2005], Sampla and others v Rushmoor Borough Council and another [2008] and Nulty v Milton Keynes BC [2012].  It was right that the rules under Part 36 were different at the time of those cases.  Version 1 was considered in the Capital Bank case; version 2 was considered in the two other cases. 

The Judge considered the approach in Sampla and Nulty and commented: “They indicated in strong and, I have to say persuasive terms that if an offeree, when he sees the way the wind is blowing in the trial changes his attitude and wants to accept an offer that he previously did not want to accept, that is a change of circumstances which means that it may no longer be appropriate to allow the offeree to accept the offer which is still on the table subject to the court’s permission”.

Please sign in to have access to the full report.

Caselaw Sign In  

If you're new here, this will guide you through creating an account. If you're already a member, simply enter your existing credentials to log in.

< Back to case list

We use cookies to improve your experience of our website. Click here to read more.