Nizami & Anor v Butt (2006)
Nizami & Anor v Butt (2006)
The Issues: Mr. Nizami suffered whiplash injury from a road accident in 2003 and in February 2005 agreed to accept damages of £2,400 plus costs without proceedings being issued. In Part 8 proceedings, the defendant sought to challenge the CFA which Mr Nizami had entered into, on the grounds that his solicitors had not made BTE inquiries sufficient to comply with the regulations (which applied to CFAs entered into prior to November 2005).
Please sign in to have access to the full report.
Caselaw Sign In
If you're new here, this will guide you through creating an account. If you're already a member, simply enter your existing credentials to log in.
