Box Legal Logo

Box Legal Logo
Home > ATE Caselaw > Purrunsing v Court & Co (a firm) & Anor (2016)

Purrunsing v Court & Co (a firm) & Anor (2016)

Purrunsing v Court & Co (a firm) & Anor (2016)

The Issues:

Astute conveyancers may recall the name of this case in relation to conveyancing fraud, but this case also concerned Part 36 offers.

On 20th May 2015, the Claimant made a Part 36 offer of £516,000. At trial he recovered £518,983.01 (including interest). Judgment was handed down on 14th April 2016. Had the Claimant actually bettered its Part 36 offer?

The Claimant argued that he was entitled to enhanced costs from the end of the 21-day period (10th June 2015). The Defendant argued that it was not correct to compare the offer sum and the sum awarded at trial as the court should take into account the fact that 309 days had elapsed between the end of the 21-day period for acceptance of the Part 36 offer and the date of judgment.

On the facts of the case, the claimant had only beaten the offer if interest was added to the offer from the expiry of the date for its acceptance up until the date of judgment.

Please sign in to have access to the full report.

Caselaw Sign In  

If you're new here, this will guide you through creating an account. If you're already a member, simply enter your existing credentials to log in.

< Back to case list

We use cookies to improve your experience of our website. Click here to read more.