Box Legal Logo

Box Legal Logo
Home > ATE Caselaw > Tabbitt v Clark (2023)

Tabbitt v Clark (2023)

Tabbitt v Clark (2023)

The Issues


The claimant brought a personal injury claim against the defendant.  The action was subject to QOCS.  The defendant made a Part 36 offer which the claimant accepted out of time, some 9 months later.

The parties agreed that the claimant could recover his costs up to date of expiry of the Part 36 offer and that the defendant was also entitled to costs but that this was subject to the provisions of QOCS, i.e. that these could not be enforced without the leave of the court. The claimant sought a declaration in the following form:

"Pursuant to rule 44.14 CPR the Defendant is not permitted to enforce (including by way of set-off) the costs Order in paragraph 3 of this Order in his favour against the Claimant."

CPR 44.14 (2) provides that:

“Orders for costs made against the claimant may only be enforced after the proceedings have been concluded and the costs have been assessed or agreed”.

At first instance, the only issue before the court was whether to make the declaration.    However, at the time of the judge’s judgement, changes to the QOCS rules were under consideration by the Civil Procedure Rules Committee and on 7th October 2022 the CPRC approved an amendment to the rules which would permit enforcement of a costs order in the defendant’s favour, against an order or agreement for damages or costs in the claimant’s favour.




Please sign in to have access to the full report.

Caselaw Sign In  

If you're new here, this will guide you through creating an account. If you're already a member, simply enter your existing credentials to log in.


< Back to case list




We use cookies to improve your experience of our website. Click here to read more.