Box Legal Logo

Box Legal Logo
Home > ATE Caselaw > The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others (2021)

The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others (2021)

The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others (2021)

Insurers to pay out for Covid-19 related business interruption losses

 

The Issues

Policyholders whose businesses were affected by the Covid-19 pandemic suffered significant losses, resulting in a large numbers of claims being brought under business interruption (BI) insurance policies.

Many of the policyholders are small and medium enterprises whose policies are focused on property damage and only have basic cover for BI as a consequence of property damage.   However, some policies also cover BI from other causes, in particular infectious or notifiable diseases ('disease clauses') and prevention of access and public authority closures or restrictions ('prevention of access clauses'). In some cases, insurers had accepted liability under these policies.  In other cases, insurers have disputed liability while policyholders considered that they had cover leading to widespread concern about the lack of clarity and certainty.

The High Court’s judgment last September resolved most of the key issues but as parties were unable to reach agreement, insurers and the FCA made 'leapfrog' appeals to the Supreme Court.



Please sign in to have access to the full report.

Caselaw Sign In  

If you're new here, this will guide you through creating an account. If you're already a member, simply enter your existing credentials to log in.


< Back to case list




We use cookies to improve your experience of our website. Click here to read more.