Search The Site
Search The Site
Dockerill & Healey v Tullett, Macefield v Bakos and Tubridy v Sarwar (2012)
Only limited costs recoverable in low value infant approval proceedings.
More...Germany v Flatman and Weddall v Barchester Healthcare (2011)
Solicitor who takes responsibility for client's disbs is liable for all adverse costs
More...Sylvia Henry -v- News Group Newspapers Ltd (2013)
Exceeding budgeted costs in claims over £25,000
More...Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council Court of Appeal (2006)
Procedure to be followed by a Court when assessing reasonableness of an ATE premium in the context of a small personal injury claim.
More...Landau v The Big Bus Co. (1) and Zeital (2) (2014)
QOCS does not apply if it did not apply at first instance.
More...Nokes -v- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust (2015)
Clinical Negligence ATE premium of £5,680+IPT is recoverable (See Mitchell v Gilling Smith (2017) above)
More...Dalton and Others -v- British Telecommunications plc (2015)
NIHL/tinnitus is a disease not an injury, so higher success fee applies.
More...SRA - Disciplinary Decision - Steven Eldred (2015)
Solicitor's failure to pay premiums to ATE Insurer breaches Code of Conduct (see also SRA v David Johnson 2021 above)
More...Casseldine v The Diocese of LLandaff Board for Social Responsibility (a charity) (unreported) (2013)
QOCS Protection where previous solicitor instructed pre April 2013
More...Acierno v Robinson Plc & Anor (Unreported) (2016)
Discontinuance following non - compliant medical evidence, means QOCS protection lost.
More...
