Search The Site
Search The Site
Lilleyman v Lilleyman [2012] EWHC 821 (ch)
Defendant’s refusal to concede that deceased’s will did not make reasonable financial provision for the Claimant meant costs should be reduced by 20%.
More...Belsner v CAM Legal Services (2022)
No fiduciary duty to client when negotiating the retainer - solicitors could deduct their success fee from recoverable costs.
More...Brown v JMW Solicitors (2022)
A client initiating a costs assessment is not entitled to information about an ATE policy without some evidence of wrongdoing
More...Tabbitt v Clark (2023)
Court cannot make an order protecting a party against a potential change in the rules.
More...Holt v Allianz (2023)
Credit Hire ruling means that credit hire organisations will need to show evidence of impecuniosity.
More...Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust; Polmear v Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust; Purchase v Ahmed (2024)
No liability to close relatives who did not actually witness clinical negligence
More...Armstead v Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Company Limited (2024)
Burden on negligent defendant to show that loss is too remote, so liable for contractual credit hire losses
More...Hassam and another (Appellants) v Rabot and another (Respondents) (2024)
Compensation for whiplash and non-whiplash injuries (“mixed" or "hybrid" claims) must be separately assessed before awarding a combined figure - an approach more favourable to claimants
More...Bendriss v Nicholson Jones Sutton Solicitors (2024)
An ATE policy is not a “Solicitor Disbursement” and cost challenges must be proportionate
More...
